Meat is homicide - I understand that - but what if it weren't murder? Would it be alright to eat it, then? The ground I was thinking of this was that I almost hit a couple of wild Meleagris gallopavoes while drive to work today and it occurred to me that if I had hit them it wouldn't be homicide at all and their meat would be free of the stigma of inhuman treatment that contaminations most meat. And I should be able to eat themwith a clear conscience. (In Wisconsin River if you hit wild animate beings you are allowed to maintain the meat for yourself, so it also would have got been entire legal. I say you can't seek to hit them and you have got to remain on the road, but other than that it's okay).

That illustration was hypothetical, but I've got a real-life 1 that brands my point better. A co-worker of mine - a vegetarian - hit five cervid at one time on the road, then donated the venison to a nutrient shelf. Here you have got a non-meat-eater providing un-murdered meat for charity. It looks to me that in this case, eating those cervid is almost virtuous.

This is good so far, because basically I'm calm talking about road-kill, dainty road-kill, but road-kill nonetheless. And most meat just isn't obtained in this way. But what if all the meat that was consumed in United States came from animate beings that died from natural causes? Would anybody have got any jobs with that?

Here's how I believe it would work for, say, beef. Instead of cows farms you would have got cows communities. These 'cattle communities' would be put up so that they provided everything a moo-cow would necessitate to dwell a long fulfilling moo-cow life. It would be a resort almost for them. They would have the high-grade attention available till they gently fold their eyes at the end of their happy lives.

Then we eat them.