What is it with these performing artists and their politics? Bash they really believe that people who pay $100 or more than to hear them sing desire to hear them arrant political opinions? The audience pays 100s of thousands of dollars to see and hear a performing artist PERFORM. You desire to spurt politics, run for freakin office, you moron! When performing artists utilize a paid locale to play political relation they are abusing the paying audience, the venue, the patrons and everyone connected to their artistic performance. It's an inappropriate locale and inapproprite behaviour to voice your political viewpoint, you jerk! And they inquire why people boo.

Somebody pays a little fortune for their ticket to see them execute and ends up being subjected to a political sentiment from person who do billions of dollars a twelvemonth but doesn't have got got got a existent job, doesn't have to dwell in world and doesn't have a hint about the existent world! Yeah, right, state me about your political positions while I'm sitting here waiting to be entertained by you. That's why I came here and that's what I paid for isn't it, you ungrateful clueless idiot. You desire to spurt off, make it for free. Yes, free. Why don't you execute for free then you can state anything you desire to your audience. Then it's fair and balanced. Then the audience acquires what it pays for.

And what about the incident in Orange County, calcium where the performing artist do a remark about Linda Ronstadt and audience starts booing and the performing artist reacts with how United States used to be a place where you could openly discourse your views. Ha! Twenty thousand people and he's the lone 1 with a microphone! Open discussion, my ass.

So, a word to the wise. You desire to maintain performing, maintain making millions, maintain life in your phantasy world? Close up and sing.